An independent beer shop, managed by two directors, has been struggling with a perplexing situation involving debt collection. Established in 2022, the small business has been a focal point for the community but has recently been receiving unexpected gas bills despite having no gas supply. Their energy provider is Octopus Energy, known for reliable service, yet issues arose with a gas meter that they believe has been incorrectly linked to their premises.

The directors suspect that the gas meter, which is on the property, is mistakenly attributed to their shop while actually serving a neighboring location. They have refused to pay these erroneous bills, which now total £3,000, leading to aggressive collection efforts.

After receiving their first billing statement from Opus Energy in 2023, the owners reached out nearly 20 times to clarify the situation, but no resolution ensued. This confusion escalated when EDF, the parent company that acquired Opus’s small business accounts, began sending billing notices. Despite multiple calls and emails to EDF, the issue remains unresolved, prompting the business to hire a certified gas engineer for a report confirming that they do not use the gas meter.

With no outcome achieved after repeated assurances from EDF that the matter would be addressed, the shop has faced visits from three debt collectors. Upon inspecting the premises and discovering there was no gas connection, collectors recognized the mistake and departed.

The ongoing debt chase is a source of immense frustration for the directors, especially as the mounting threats of £3,000 in debt loom, jeopardizing their business’s stability. James from Bedfordshire expressed the urgent need for a solution, lamenting the time lost dealing with this stress.

Katherine Denham’s Insight

This predicament highlights the absurdity of being pursued for a debt related to a gas supply that does not exist for this business. EDF’s takeover of meter information from Opus Energy introduced complications, with Opus indicating their claim to the supply started in February 2023, based on confirmation from the landlord.

Petty concerns like this are burdensome for small business owners who have enough to manage without the overwhelming need to resolve inaccuracies in billing for 18 months. Opus claimed it could not validate the meter’s association until reliability was confirmed and continued billing the shop until resolving the confusion.

Although the directors rightly considered obtaining a gas engineer’s report, it shouldn’t have been necessary. Upon contacting EDF and Opus, it was verified that the gas meter was indeed servicing a different property. EDF amended its records accordingly. However, updating the national meter database took an additional two months.

EDF acknowledged the delay in resolving this issue swiftly, stating they must collaborate with other parties to adjust the meter information. As a sign of goodwill for the inconvenience, EDF has now provided the shop with £150 and ceased debt collection activities.

Opus Energy, meanwhile, confirmed their cooperation with EDF on this matter and offered apologies for any distress caused by this ongoing issue.

The shop’s owners are relieved to finally resolve the matter but remain frustrated over the amount of time and energy that have been wasted.

Ongoing Mail Confusion for a Hertfordshire Resident with Nationwide Building Society

Meanwhile, another case has surfaced regarding a resident in Hertfordshire, who has been receiving mail from Nationwide Building Society directed to a previous occupant of their home since 2021.

The resident initially returned the misdirected mail, hoping to prompt Nationwide to update their records. However, the letters continued to arrive in large numbers. Personal visits to the local branch yielded little help, and online communications provided only generic apologies without real solutions. Frustrated, she escalated her concerns to the chief executive along with three examples of the mistakenly sent letters.

A response from the complaints team assured her that the issue would be addressed, yet the mail kept coming. The resident’s primary worry transcends personal inconvenience; it underscores the potential risk of mishandled personal data affecting others, including her daughters who are also Nationwide members.

Katherine Denham’s Response

The poor handling of this situation by Nationwide demonstrates the importance of maintaining accurate records. When identical cases arise, organizations typically should correct their databases to prevent sensitive documents from being incorrectly dispatched. This is particularly crucial for financial institutions.

Fortunately, the resident acted with good intentions and reached out to inform Nationwide of their oversight. The building society admitted that human error had caused the confusion, but the persistence was nevertheless concerning.

Nationwide responded, acknowledging the mistake and assuring the resident that steps had been taken to prevent further issues, but vigilance is still urged. She has been advised to report any additional rogue letters that may arrive in the future.

• £689,209 The value saved by Your Money Matters readers this year.

If you have a financial issue you would like Katherine Denham to investigate, please reach out via email with a contact number.